Are Millennials Changing Corporate America’s
Culture?
While there is
a growing body of literature addressing America’s contemporary
multi-generational corporate culture, relatively little attention has been
given to the changes driven by the youngest generation entering the U.S.
workforce. The importance on the subject
relies on the fact that the imminent influx of a new generation in the U. S.
workforce are affecting the way organizations are conducting their business,
particularly attracting, hiring, on-boarding, and retaining their talent. The most recent marketing researches
conducted by the US Labor department (2016) confirm the intergenerational gap
existing in the US as the leading caused of imminent conflicts in many
corporations resulting in higher attrition numbers that consequently have
impacted productivity as well as revenue (See Table 1). Based on 2015 U.S. Census Bureau data, the
declining fertility rates and decreasing international migration, the United
States population has shown a significant decline in growth - compared to
previous decades - as it continues to grow older (USCB, 2016). Based on data from the American Association
of Retired Persons [AARP], 2010, over twenty-five percent of the baby boomers -
born between 1946 and 1964 – have delayed retirement based on lack of financial
resources. The alarming statistics published by the Society of Human Resources
Management (SHRM, 2015) revealed an increase in the millennial population,
individuals born between 1980 and 2001.
Consequently, the U.S. workforce is experiencing a disparity in the
generational mix of talent. According to
the interview that Michael Pepe, chief of the human resources division for
VIRTUA a non-for-profit health system gave for the SHRM Magazine, in 2013, Millennials
accounted for twenty-eight percent of their workforce and experienced attrition
rates of forty percent just during the first semester of the fiscal year. Many researchers attribute the underpinning
of the battlefield resulting among the multigenerational workforce to millennial
behavioral assumptions. Although the
society of human resources management confirms the issue is being addressed,
the increasing generational gap continues to impact turnover levels. This
research seeks to intents to explore the different views exposed in the
existing literature shared by organizational and human resources scholars on
how Millennials can potentially impact America’s corporate culture. According to the market research results
published by the Department of Labor, (2016) the intergenerational gap existing
in the United States might be blamed for the imminent conflicts impacting
corporate America’s overall organizational culture. The United States Census Bureau (USCB)
exposes the declining fertility rates and decreasing international migration as
main factors for the significant decline in growth of the population, compared
to previous decades (USCB, 2014). Meanwhile, the Society of Human Resources
Management (SHRM) alarming statistics revealed an increase in the Millennials
population (individuals born between 1980 and 2001). Consequently, SHRM recognizes the corporate
culture in the United States might be experiencing a drastic shift affecting
the way corporate leaders view their organizational culture (SHRM, 2015).
Taking into consideration that different paradigms intrinsically contain
diverse ontological and epistemological views, reality can be perceived
differently. Therefore, the paradigms
will not only underpin the research approach we will assume for this research,
but it would also determine the methodology and methods we will adopt. For example, a positivist methodology is directed at explaining relationships and
this research seeks to establish the relationship between the onboarding
processes, the integration of Millennials in a multi-generational workforce and
the high attrition levels among this group.
On the other hand, “positivists
attempt to identify causes which influence outcomes” (Creswell, 2009, p.
7). Our research will focus on
Corporate America’s reality currently being affected by the increasing
generational gap impacting productivity and generating an alarming increase in
attrition levels, particularly among Millennials, also know as generation X.
Crotty
(1998) defined Ontology as “the study of being” (1998, p. 10). From this point of view, establishing an
ontological research position at the initial phase of the process is critical
to drive the researcher to select the research design. While the researchers
take a position in reference to the perception they have on how things are and
how they work they will be in a position to build a central question of whether
social entities need to be perceived as objective or subjective. For example, in this particular research, we
are taking a realistic and objective approach that will drive the research to
the data we will find from recent statistics published by the US Labor
department, the Society of Human Resources Management as well as particular
studies conducted by marketing groups for benchmarking purposes within any
specific industries. With a realistic
approach we are aware that one truth exists in reference to how the
generational gap is affecting Millennials and the short tenure affecting many
corporations. We can further discover
through objective measurements how the generational gap has contributed towards
attrition levels and thru the analysis process utilize the information obtained
to correct this issue thru the implementation of a new on-boarding process.
References:
2014 National Population Projections. (n.d.).
Retrieved September 24, 2016, from
http://www.census.gov/population/projections/data/national/2014.html
American Association of Retired Persons,
(2010). Research & Strategic
Analysis - Approaching 65: A survey of Baby Boomers turning 65 years old.
Retrieved from http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/ general/approaching-65.pdf
Carnevale, A.,
Hanson, A., & Gulish, A., (2013).
Georgetown University Press – Failure to Launch: Structural Shift and the New Lost Generation. Retrieved from
https://georgetown.app.box.com/s/8tchnjo0wq9meamwwn5f
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K.
(2007). Research methods in education (6th Edition). London: Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational research:
Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (5th
ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social
research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. London ; Thousand
Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Smith,
M. (2016). Society of Human Resources
Management: Reducing New Employee Turnover Among Emerging Adults. Retrieved from https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/employee-relations/pages/reducing-new-employee-turnover-among-emerging-adults.aspx
No comments:
Post a Comment